首页> 外文OA文献 >Time is Money: Disentangling Higher Education Cost-Sharing and Commodification Through Deferred Graduate Retirement
【2h】

Time is Money: Disentangling Higher Education Cost-Sharing and Commodification Through Deferred Graduate Retirement

机译:时间就是金钱:通过推迟研究生退休来消除高等教育分担费用和商品化问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Current higher education policy debates in Europe are increasingly focusing on raising the share of private funding. To date, policy proposals have centred on a relatively small number of alternatives, namely full public funding, tuition fees, either up-front or delayed and income-contingent, or a surtax on graduate incomes. Here, I present an alternative that, to my knowledge, has not been suggested previously, but sidesteps some important objections against other forms of private contributions. The basic idea explored here is to increase the statutory retirement age for higher education graduates relative to non-graduates. In principle, the resulting decrease in future public pension liabilities can be converted into increased funds for present spending on higher education. In this first discussion of the above proposal, I consider important caveats, perform an order-of-magnitude estimate of whether the financial implications of Deferred Graduate Retirement (DGR) are comparable to those of tuition fees, and discuss advantages and disadvantages compared to more established policy options. I conclude that, at least in the continental European context, DGR promises a number of economically and politically desirable properties compared to established alternatives, and deserves more serious investigation.
机译:欧洲当前有关高等教育政策的辩论越来越集中在提高私人资金的份额上。迄今为止,政策建议都集中在相对较少的替代方案上,即全额公共资金,学费,预付款或延期费用和有收入收入的费用,或对研究生收入附加费。据我所知,在这里,我提出了一个替代方案,据我所知,以前没有提出过,但是回避了一些对其他形式的私人捐款的重要反对意见。这里探讨的基本思想是相对于非毕业生,增加高等教育毕业生的法定退休年龄。原则上,由此产生的未来公共养老金负债的减少可以转化为用于当前高等教育支出的增加的资金。在上述建议的第一次讨论中,我考虑了重要的警告事项,对递延研究生退休金(DGR)的财务影响是否可与学费相提并论,并进行了数量级估计,并讨论了与其他项目相比的优缺点。既定的政策选择。我得出的结论是,至少在欧洲大陆背景下,与已确立的替代方案相比,DGR保证了许多在经济和政治上令人期望的特性,值得进一步认真研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Barakat, B.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号